Showing posts with label yin. Show all posts
Showing posts with label yin. Show all posts

Yin?

Posted on 5:58 PM by jr cline | 0 comments

__ __

Update at the bottom.
 
I'm not an authority on this subject.  This is just what I think.  

My friend John from Owl and Terrapin had a yin to hear about Yin. I didn't think that would be a big deal, but it has turned out to be more Yang than I imagined. I've spent a few days doing a little research, consulting with one of my mentors, and getting my thoughts together.

A very little bit of history.

Yin is part of both Confucianism and Taoism. Confucius didn't know about Yin. It became part to that system of thought after his death. Confucius taught moral and ethical behavior.  When Yin/Yang was absorbed by Confucianism, both Yin and Yang were endowed with moral attributes.  Yin and Yang, as part of a ethical dichotomy carry moral judgements.
Taoists see Yin a bit differently.  Yin is part of a wave, an oscillation. It isn't part of the dichotomy of good and evil or black and white.

Yin has been described as feminine, cold, wet, slow, soft, passive, yielding, and diffuse. It has been associated with darkness, water, earth, the moon, and night.
 
In either system Yin has no meaning apart from Yang.  They give rise to each other. They compliment each other.  The difficulty in discussing yin arises from Yin's reliance on Yang for its existence and meaning.  There is no wave it one half is missing.


Yin and Yang try to look as different as possible while being identical.  And reversible. It's the idea of identical differences. Check out Alan Watts for more on this. 
Yin is part of an energy wave.

Before "let there be light" (Genesis 1:3) was there only dark.  No....there was no dichotomy.  There was no dark.  "Let there be light" Yang and Yin.
If there was only Yang, you would create Yin.
There is nothing to do
and everything to do
Now
Tao
The Universe
God
Spirit
The Divine
The word is not the thing
Don't grasp
Expand containing all things

What can you know?  Words are obscured by their proliferation.
The 10,000 things
This from that
That from this
The affirmation is rooted in denial of the other?

They ate from עֵץ הַדַּעַת טוֹב וָרָע? (Genesis 3:6).  God tried to warn them.  Avoid the dichotomy. They didn't.  And we still eat there.

It's this and that.
Not this or that.

Yin/Yang
Mind/Universe
Wave/Particle
UIDst = 7hd + 4hd

The illusion that one will win over the other is a silly illusion.

UPDATE

Same Differences

"Which meaning brings meaning
when brought to mind?
Which meaning brings meaning
when brought to heart?
Feel meaniong, know purpose.
Know meaning, feel purpose.
Witness the qualities within their differences
and know that the Tao...rests in their sameness."
~ The Tao of Circles by Carl Garant

See what else I’m doing.
Follow me on twitter: jr cline
My Instagram profile

30 day challenge, day 23

Posted on 7:45 AM by jr cline | 2 comments

Day 23- your favorite book

I thought about this a lot.  My favorite book isn't a published book and will never be a published book.
  
 I've had this book since 1978, longer than my children have been alive.  It has served many purposes over the years.  Most often I've use it for a journal.
I rarely date my hand written journals because it is always now.
  
Here are a few excerpts from the pages.
  
Normal personalities are not necessarily healthy.  Our social system is indifferent to the individual as long as the individual conforms.
Some warning signals that an individual's life is sickening and dispiriting: anxiety, guilt, fatigue, boredom, pain, or frustration.
  
Joe Jew of Jesus' day looked on Sam Pharisee like Joe Christian looks at Sam Pastor.  It is important to recognize their relative  goodness.  Even though they were relatively good, they miss the truth.
  
"This is It
and I am It
and your are It
and so is that
and He is It
and She is It
and It is It
and That is That"
~ James Broughton
  
"They that trust in their wealth, and boast themselves in the multitude of their riches, none of them can by any means redeem their brother...And when they die they shall carry nothing away." ~ Ps.49:6, 7, 17
Are out scriptures any more valid or inspired than other spiritual writings?  Are they inspired/valid simply because we choose to believe them?  Or are they valid because they contain eternal truths that are spiritual laws of the Universe and can also be found in other spiritual writings?
What are the natures of Gnostic and stoic thought in the 1st century?
  
Is experiencing the eschatological Jesus the same as experiencing the historical Jesus?
 
That is enough of that.

Have an awesome weekend!